Stephen H
2011-09-28 02:59:44 UTC
The reason I ask is that I've never been able to locate one in which I didn't get very score in over 40 years, but I've psychiatrists have their own theory.
And they even contradict clear medical evidence(at least 5 psychiatrists all agreeing to contradict it) to show that they are right and treat this serious mental illness that they originally unilaterally asserted 7 or 8 years ago, and didn't even bother to tell me to begin with. I haven't actually across much that they've written that I agree with other than I've heard voices sometimes, but I wasn't aware that was a crime that's more severe than say terrorism or mass murder but psychiatrists seem to think is and should be punished by inflicting suffering, illness and death (usually drawn out unless they get a little overzealous and make a mistake that they have to find an excuse for). With me they've tried to treat it twice for months with seriously harmful drugs and it does cause extreme psychological along with all the other damage, so I imagine that might help to reduce the mental illness (whatever that may be) but the psychological tests I already know don't seem to be sensitive enough to pick up the psychological damage and I'm still getting very high scores.
It doesn't really make sense to me. If they wanted people to stop being mentally ill and destroy all psychological health in the process while they are inflicting brain damage and wide ranging physical damage, you'd think that that they'd just keep people institutionalised for life, instead of doing it piecemeal and and allowing the government to put in appeal processes which only allows them to do so much damage and doesn't always harm people enough to prevent them from probably winning appeals, so they just have to let people go just before the appeal to keep their virtually unblemished record in place when they inflict enough damage to win appeals, but can't manage enough with people who are too psychologically healthy at the start of the attempted conversion process. The drugs do seem to be getting better and messing people up, so they can probably win more, but they don't seem to have made that much progress me, so although I've never managed to be able to force an appeal in a slightly more impartial tribunal with months of drug damage in place, I'd still like to make some progress on positive change and eliminating the practice of targeting people (even extremely psychologically healthy people) for destruction and elimination via harmful drugs.
So which psychological tests would you choose, just so I can ensure it's not my choice and it's completely unbiased (unlike the subjective opinion of psychiatrists which seemingly bears no relationship to reality whatsoever)?