Question:
What are some of your thoughts on the theoretical "link" between creative genius and insanity?
7heSleeplessDreamer
2009-09-17 01:29:20 UTC
The theory has been around since the dawn of free thought, with infinite documented case studies throughout history to back it up- many who we've all heard of, as they've managed to make history themselves. It was said about Albert Einstein, Pablo Picasso, Edgar Allan Poe- even Hitler. These famous figures were both the geniuses and revolutionaries of their time... and the personification of all things "crazy".
Recent studies have shown that the percentage of psychological disorder found in creative and free-thinking people like writers, artists, musicians is alarmingly high. Too high, some argue, to be a coincidence.

As a writer, I'm inclined to agree. I have my reasons. What is your take on it... is there really a "link", or just coincidence? If there is a link, what do you think causes it... and why?

Also, do you think people with a brilliantly creative minds and a touch of insanity could cease to be brilliant if they found a way to suppress or overcome it?
Three answers:
G. B. J., Md.
2009-09-17 02:17:31 UTC
Well, 7heSleeplessDreamer, the consumption of larger than normal amounts of alcohol does not immediately make one insane. However, the imbibing of liquids and substances that drastically alter the normal functions of the brain, is by action, somewhat of an act of insanity, is it not?



Poe, it is said, suffered from Melancholy [Depression we call it now], and in his days, Men particularly, Brandied, Ported and Aled a lot anyway. Picasso was diagnosed Manic Depressant or Bi-Polar. And Hitler, well, though I'm extremely far from a distant admirer, mentally was brilliant, while it seems his biological father's escalated affair with a Jewish woman, to the point of leaving him and his mother for her, ultimately planted and fertilized the seeds of 'Hate' inside of him.



I can't say what genius is, however, I've been fortunate to be born with a deep desire toward creativity, fast and open-minded thinking. Like the fictional character, Spider Man; it is my gift, and my curse.



The combination of the three creates a paradox. A conundrum that motivates a maelstrom of thought provoking mental actions that never seem to cease. Having to dummy down during a conversation, so that people don't feel intimidated, or become annoyed is a constant that has to be monitored often. Throwing around ideas like splashing a seemingly unending assortment of paint colors on a canvas somehow is a difficult thing for people to accept.



Perhaps the average person does not consciously care to multitask with their minds, although subconsciously they do all of the time. I mean, we walk, talk, chew bubble-gum, and/or trim fingernails, drink coffee, tea or whatever, while listening to music, or texting, or talking on a phone and cooking--all at once--not to forget to breath, and or swallow and occasionally blink. However, once you point out to them that they're doing all of that at the same time, they become annoyed at the realization.



I for one, like to sit and write, read, listen to music, watch TV on, or away from the PC, and hold conversations all at once. To me, it is refreshing, exhilarating, entertaining and time devouring.



If I'm encumbered from this stimuli for too long, I become extremely rattled and annoyed. I detest boredom. In the same vane, I find highly creative people--ala the ilk you mentioned--to be extremely fascinating. The ability to pull something beautiful from the air is as magical as air itself... Of course, I don't really think I'm bordering on insanity, particularly because by definition, I really don't do the same thing, the same way, and expect to get different results. What say you? GBJ
2009-09-17 01:51:00 UTC
I agree. I have a slightly higher IQ than most (only 133, not genius level like einstein or anything like that). It is high enough to see things in a different light than most people though, and some would say I'm a bit off my rocker. My views, the things I think about, the things I can do, the way I live and the way I act, all seems to differ from other peoples notions of normal living. I don't seem to follow the same sets of socially acceptable rules and boundries that most other people follow. I think society is chasing it's tail more often than it realizes it is and most of the parameters they follow are idiotic, and huge wastes of time at best.



I wouldn't say I'm better than most people, just different. I think we scare people because our attitudes pertaining to life, to life cycles, and to the meanings of life are so different from there own. We follow a different path and see things that are beyond their scope of seeing, so they don't understand us or are theories. So we're labeled as crazy, or revolutionist, or genius, or silly, or unusual, or odd; when in fact it's they who we think are really nuts. Fun to hang out with, but limited in their field of vision and thought.



New pup: I've never heard of that system before, quite interesting stuff. I looked it up in wikepedia. If what they say is right and I'm reading it right, then I am an INTJ. Crazy, but most of what it says about INTJ's seems to hit the nail squarely on the head for me. Explains a lot. Thumbs up.
Happy Summer
2009-09-17 01:54:34 UTC
my iq is 139 and my life has been hell...it's very difficult to attain and to manage a "normal lifestyle".....i score an INFJ according to Meyers-Briggs which makes it even more difficult for me since i'm considered to be a rare 1%....BTY i've had 60 years experience..medications have been necessary but have never been the answer to my torment.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...